Chino’s four-story apartment project faces resistance from some residents

Chino City is facing a significant backlash from some residents regarding its recent proposal to develop a four-story apartment complex at a key intersection in the downtown area. The Better Community Foundation, represented by Freya Zhao, has voiced strong opposition, arguing that the introduction of high-density apartments could negatively impact the suburban atmosphere and safety of the community. Zhao emphasized that the increase in vehicle traffic would further complicate residents’ commutes.

At a recent community hearing, developers presented their plans for the project, which would be located at the intersection of Euclid Avenue and Schaefer Street. Many residents expressed their dissatisfaction and raised questions, turning the event into a chaotic forum.

The developers revealed that the proposal includes constructing a four-story building with 273 residential units on a 10-acre lot, alongside a five-story parking garage with a capacity for 500 vehicles, a 143,000-square-foot self-storage facility, and 18,600 square feet of retail space, along with 128 parking spots.

Zachary Cenit, a Chino resident, raised concerns about placing a 50-foot-tall building in an area that has been home to a two-story residential community for 24 years. “Is this mandated by the state, or is it your own design?” he questioned. Other residents worried that such tall structures would obstruct their views of the San Gabriel Mountains, potentially affecting property values.

Attorney Chad Lo, representing the project, clarified that the development falls within a mixed-use zone approved by residents and aims to meet state housing mandates, which require a minimum of 273 units. He noted that 5% to 8% of these units would be designated as affordable housing.

Freya Zhao also highlighted the implications for community safety and traffic, explaining that while affordable housing is essential for those in need, the state’s funding for such projects appears to waste taxpayers’ money. She questioned the apparent contradiction of increasing housing investment while homelessness continues to rise.

In addition, developers mentioned that there are three vacant acres of land to the north owned by another company, which plans to build three-story apartments. The current development proposal has yet to receive final approval, and this publication will continue to monitor updates and resident feedback regarding the project.